The amygdala is importantly involved in fear-related processes that go beyond the conditioning of fear to anxiety more generally It thus may be that experiences of control, and other circumstances that might activate the mPFCv, confer resistance to the development of anxiety. CT99021 datasheet Conclusions and clinical implications The general conclusion to be reached is that control

is not detected or computed by brain stem structures such as the DRN, but rather by circuitry within the mPFCv. Stress or aversive stimulation per se would seem to activate structures such as the DRN, with this activation then being inhibited by input Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical from the mPFCv if behavioral control is present. This arrangement might make good evolutionary sense. Primitive organisms possess only a limited behavioral capacity to deal with threats, and in such species adaptations and responses to threats are largely physiological in nature. For these types of species behavioral control and other methods of psychological Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical coping are largely irrelevant, and so it may Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical make sense that more primitive parts of the brain that are involved in responding to threats are themselves insensitive to dimensions such as behavioral controllability. As organisms became more complex, behavioral methods of coping became possible. Under

circumstances in which a threat can be dealt with behaviorally, it would be adaptive to inhibit or reduce the more physiological adaptive mechanisms since they can be costly in various ways.46 Of course, more recently evolved “higher” regions of the brain such as the mPFC would have taken this function. It is also possible that a lack of control might weaken the inhibitory control exerted by the mPFC. The experiments discussed above were Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical not well suited to detecting effects in this direction given possible “ceiling effects.” Indeed, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical we have some evidence that uncontrollability might exert this sort of effect, but it is too preliminary to present. Although our evidence is limited, it further suggests that initial experiences with stressors can bias the system such that Rolziracetam the mPFCv

responds to later stressors as it did to earlier stressors. If this plasticity proves to be real, then this would constitute a mechanism of resilience. The fear conditioning data presented above suggests that this mechanism may generalize broadly, with control over tailshock generalizing to fear conditioning. Thus, experiences with control may be broadly protective. Of course, there is no reason to believe that behavioral control is unique, and there are likely other aspects of experience that would activate mPFCv inhibition of stressresponsive limbic and brain stem structures. The research and theorizing presented here articulates well with the recent clinical literature. Abnormalities in mPFC function have been detected in disorders ranging from depression47 to PTSD.