The developing brain may be directly influenced via hemodynamic changes at a time of very immature autoregulation of cerebral blood flow, or Depsipeptide indirectly through altered development of sleep/wake state architecture and programming of stress systems. Importantly, immature neurons are more sensitive to neurotoxic environmental influences.13 Pain in rat pups has been found to impact brain development adversely.37,49 However, until recently, relationships between pain and brain development in preterm infants were speculative. Recently Grunau, Miller, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical and colleagues specifically addressed in preterm infants

whether neonatal procedural pain/stress impacts the developing brain. In a longitudinal study, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical infants born very preterm at 24–32 weeks’ gestation underwent advanced MRI brain imaging early in their NICU stay and again at term-equivalent age.35 Higher pain-related stress quantified as the number of skin-breaking procedures (including tube insertions) from birth to term-equivalent age was associated with poorer neonatal brain development, after adjusting for multiple clinical confounding factors such as GA at birth, duration of Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical mechanical

ventilation, confirmed infections, surgeries, analgesia, and sedation exposure. Greater exposure to procedural pain-related stress was associated with reduced development of white matter (indexed by fractional anisotropy (FA)) and subcortical gray matter (measured by N-acetylaspartate-to-choline ratio (NAA/choline)—a marker of metabolism and density). Reduced FA was predicted by early pain prior to the first brain scan, whereas lower NAA/choline

Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical was predicted by pain exposure throughout the neonatal course. This pattern of results suggested a primary and early effect on subcortical structures with secondary Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical white matter changes. The potential for procedural stress in the NICU to affect the brain adversely was demonstrated long ago, in a study reporting that endotracheal suctioning altered neonatal cerebral blood flow.2 Recently, these using electroencephalography (EEG) to measure electrical activity or near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to examine cerebral blood flow changes, studies of cortical activity during procedures in the NICU have shown that procedures evoke responses in the cerebral cortex.14,38,39,50,51 Important differences in cortical response to touch and pain in preterm infants are evident in preterm compared to full-term neonates. In preterms, non-specific neuronal bursts of EEG activity widely dispersed in the brain were observed rather than a localized somatosensory response displayed by full-term infants.14 The findings of this study suggest a widespread immature EEG response, confirming that the preterm neonatal brain is more sensitive, consistent with poor capacity to distinguish tactile from nociceptive stimulation.