The blood was subsequently centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 m, and the serum supernatant was used to determine glucose, total protein and albumin Selleckchem VX-680 content [23] using commercially available colorimetric enzymatic kits (Labor-lab, Brazil). Samples of the gastrocnemius (red and white portions) and soleus muscles were collected and used to assess glycogen [24] and triglyceride content [23]. We also collected liver samples for glycogen [24] and total lipid analyses [23]. All the samples

were homogenised in a Polytron® for 20 s at maximum speed. They were then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min at 4°C prior to the analyses. Statistical analysis The normality of the data was confirmed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons between groups were performed by analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and the Newman-Keuls Post-hoc test when necessary. For all the analyses, the level of significance was set at p < 0.05 (Statistica 7; Statsoft, USA). Results

During the interventions in this study, the animals from the RAP and RAD groups showed a SB431542 ic50 Significant decrease in body weight over the course of the experimental period (Figure 1). However, neither group showed any clinical indications of malnutrition, such as hypoalbuminemia, hypoproteinemia or high lipid GSK2126458 order content in the liver (LIPLIV). Figure 1 Daily values of body weight for animals in the ad libitum commercial diet (ALP), restricted commercial diet (RAP), ad libitum AIN-93 diet (ALD) and restricted AIN-93 diet (RAD) groups. § Significant difference compared to the ad libitum groups (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, animals in the RAD group had significantly lower LIPLIV compared to the ALP and ALD groups Florfenicol (p < 0.05) (Table 1). The change in weight during the intervention (weight change = initial

weight – final weight) was significantly higher for the ALD group compared to the ALP group (Figure 2). Furthermore, the ALD group had greater amounts of subcutaneous adipose tissue (p < 0.05) than the other groups. In contrast, the RAP and RAD groups had significantly less adipose tissue in the mesenteric and retroperitoneal regions compared to the ad libitum groups (Table 2). Table 1 Concentrations of albumin, total protein and liver lipids observed in the ad libitum and restricted groups   ALP RAP ALD RAD ALB 2.8 ± 0.4 2.8 ± 0.1 2.9 ± 0.2 2.9 ± 0.1 PROTOTAL 6.8 ± 0.6 4.2 ± 0.5 4.8 ± 1.3 3.6 ± 0.4 LIPLIV 4.6 ± 0.6 4.2 ± 0.5 4.8 ± 1.2 3.6 ± 0.4 *° ALP Ad libitum commercial (Purina®) diet group, RAP Restricted commercial (Purina®) diet group, ALD Ad libitum semi-purified AIN-93 diet group, RAD Restricted semi-purified AIN-93 diet group, ALB Concentrations of albumin (g/dL), PRO TOTAL Total protein (g/dL), LIP LIV Liver lipids (mg/100 mg); * Significant difference compared to the ALP group (p < 0.05); °significant difference compared to the ALD group (p < 0.