The atomic structure of the Ohtake model is shown in Figure 1b. Figure 1 Basics of the GaAs(001)-4 × 6 surface. (a) A LEED pattern using an electron energy of 51 eV, (b) atomic structure proposed by Ohtake et al. (adapted from [17]. copyright 2004 American Physical Society), and (c) As 3d and Ga 3d core-level SRT2104 chemical structure photoemission

spectra with various emission angles (θ e). Figure 1c displays the As 3d and Ga 3d core-level spectra of a clean Ga-rich n-GaAs(001)-4 × 6 Ferrostatin-1 concentration surface taken in various angles from the normal emission to 60° off-normal emission. The excitation photon energies were set at 85 and 65 eV for As and Ga states, respectively. The estimated escape depth is approximately 0.3 to 0.5 nm. A visual inspection of the As (Ga) 3d photoemission data identifies a feature bulged out at low (high) binding energy, suggesting that the line shape contains components in addition to the main bulk line. In fact, deconvolution of the As 3d core-level spectrum shows four components. Accordingly,

we set up a model function with four spin-orbit pairs as well as a power-law background and a plasmon- or gap-excitation-energy loss tail. The background and loss tail are represented by least squares adjustable parameters that are included buy Blasticidin S in the model function. The background is represented by four parameters: a constant, a slope, and a power-law that is quite successful in representing the degraded electrons from shallower levels. In the energy range of the 3d spectra, the loss tail is almost entirely due to electron-hole pair excitations in the semiconductor. In GaAs, there are none that are smaller than the 1.42-eV bandgap, which implies that almost all of the line structure remains unaffected

by the loss tail. Background subtraction prior to fitting meets with a fundamental objection. It destroys the statistical relationship between the number of counts in the data point and its uncertainty, acetylcholine preventing χ 2 from reaching unity for a perfect fit and interfering with the assessment of the quality of the fit. The fact that the resolved components in the deconvolute exhibit nearly equal widths suggests that the lifetime is the same for all components. The residual differences in width are presumably due mainly to small differences in the phonon or inhomogeneous broadening of bulk and surface components. It is worth noting that a reliable least squares adjustment is readily obtained provided the model function has a multi-parameter global minimum. A multitude of unconstrained width parameters tend to produce local minima defining erroneous, unphysical parameter values. The width parameters were accordingly constrained as needed. The representative fit to the As and Ga 3d states of the clean GaAs(001)-4 × 6 surface are shown in Figure 2.