(C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.”
“By direct atomic nitrogen (N) doping, high concentration of N is incorporated into TiO2 and the doping effects are investigated.

selleck High resolution x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy core-level spectra indicate N substitution for O and formation of Ti-N bonds. Different Ti valent states are found at different N concentrations. Although the shape of the valence spectra changes significantly up on N doping, the band gap narrowing effect is insignificant. First-principles calculations confirm formation of Ti 3d gap states when N concentration exceeds 1 at. %, which leads to pinging of N 2p states in the band gap. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi: 10.1063/1.3532051]“
“Purpose: To develop criteria to identify thresholds for minimally acceptable physician performance in interpreting screening mammography studies and to profile the impact that implementing these criteria may have on the practice of radiology

in the United States.

Materials and Methods: In an institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study, an Angoff approach BKM120 supplier was used in two phases to set criteria for identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance at screening mammography as measured by sensitivity, specificity, recall rate, positive predictive value (PPV) of recall (PPV 1) and of biopsy recommendation (PPV 2), and cancer detection rate. Performance measures were considered separately. In phase I, a group of 10 expert radiologists considered a hypothetical pool of 100 interpreting physicians and conveyed their cut points of minimally acceptable performance.

HIF-1�� pathway The experts were informed that a physician’s performance falling outside the cut points would result in a recommendation to consider additional training. During each round of scoring, all expert radiologists’ cut points were summarized into a mean, median, mode, and range; these were presented back to the group. In phase II, normative data on performance were shown to illustrate the potential impact cut points would have on radiology practice. Rescoring was done until consensus among experts was achieved. Simulation methods were used to estimate the potential impact of performance that improved to acceptable levels if effective additional training was provided.

Results: Final cut points to identify low performance were as follows: sensitivity less than 75%, specificity less than 88% or greater than 95%, recall rate less than 5% or greater than 12%, PPV 1 less than 3% or greater than 8%, PPV 2 less than 20% or greater than 40%, and cancer detection rate less than 2.5 per 1000 interpretations.