Body positions (lying, reclining, sitting,

Body positions (lying, reclining, sitting, Caspase inhibitor standing, leaning), transitions (lie to sit, sit to lie, recline to sit, sit to recline, recline to stand, stand to recline, sit to stand, stand to sit), and gait (walking, ascending and descending stairs, running, and jumping on both legs) are measured. It has been found

to be > 98% accurate when measuring duration, frequency, body position, and intensity of a variety of physical activities in normal adults (Zhang et al 2003), and reliable and valid for measuring time spent walking in people after stroke (Saremi et al 2006). We also compared the IDEEA with direct observation in three people after stroke with varying walking abilities. There are two algorithms available for use, one of which is more sensitive to pathological movement. When using this algorithm, we found that the accuracy of duration of physical activity was 99% and the accuracy of frequency of physical activity was 94%. An investigator visited participants’

homes and calibrated the device. The recording of physical activity was then begun, with the investigator returning to turn the device off and check the data at the end of the day. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3,1) for time on feet and activity counts between the 2 days of measurement across 2 weeks for people with stroke were 0.69 and 0.80, respectively, and for healthy controls were 0.68 and 0.50, respectively. Given that there was some variability across the two days of measurement, physical activity data were averaged across the two days. Free-living physical activity was reported as duration (time on feet selleck chemicals and time not on feet) and frequency of activity (activity counts) Urease carried out per day (Berlin et al 2006). ‘Time on feet’ was measured in minutes and comprised the time spent walking, going up and down stairs, standing, and in sit to stand transitions. ‘Time

not on feet’ comprised time spent sitting, reclining, and lying down. ‘Activity counts’ comprised the number of steps walked, stairs ascended and descended, and number of sit to stand transitions. Data were obtained from 42 people with stroke and 21 apparently healthy controls, which meant that each day of the week was represented by data from 6 stroke survivors and 3 healthy controls. Data were tested for normal distribution. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test indicated that the number of transitions, the number of stairs, and the time spent lying down, reclining, making transitions, and ascending and descending stairs were not normally distributed in both groups. The number of steps and activity counts were not normally distributed in people with stroke. However, independent t-tests and Mann-Whitney tests examining the difference between groups yielded the same results. Therefore, we present the size of the differences between groups as mean difference (95% CI) and the statistical significance from independent t-tests.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>