, 2007 and Coughlin Selleck PD332991 et al., 2010). Predictions on drug combinations  . The highest sensitivity of SpAktPer was found for the total amount of ErbB3 and ErbB2, which confirms that expression level of these receptors plays a significant role in modulating the response of the ErbB network to anti-ErbB2 inhibitors. In ( Schoeberl et al., 2009) ErbB3 was identified

as a key node in controlling pAkt, which led directly to the design of a novel anti-ErbB3 inhibitor MM-121. According to our analysis, simultaneous inhibition of both ErbB3 and ErbB2 by a combination of drugs might result in a greater suppression of pAkt, as compared to mono-therapy with an ErbB2 inhibitor (not tested). Importantly, in the presence of the drug, SpAktPer retained relatively high sensitivity to the parameters of PI3K and PDK1, which indicates that the compounds, targeting these proteins, could be candidates for combination therapy with pertuzumab. We tested this

by measuring the effect of LY294002 and UCN-01 combined with pertuzumab in the PE04 and OVCAR4 cell lines. Both drug combinations were effective, showing additional Ferroptosis inhibition inhibition of pAkt as compared to pertuzumab alone (Fig. 5). The majority of existing cancer-related modelling studies employ local sensitivity analysis methods (LSA) to assess the impact of single parametric perturbations on the model readouts of interest. Based on this, conclusions are drawn on the potential inhibitory or stimulatory effects of oncogenic mutations on the level of the network output signals (Birtwistle et al., 2007 and Chen et al., 2009) and predictions of potential targets for anti-cancer therapies are generated (Schoeberl et al., 2009). However, LSA has some serious limitations which should be taken into consideration when interpreting local sensitivity metrics in terms related to drug discovery. Firstly, in traditional LSA methods the parameters are varied only in a localised region around the nominal parameter values, and sensitivity

metrics are derived under the assumption that there is a linear relationship between input parameters and model outputs. At the same time drug effects presume significant suppression of the targeted protein activity, which can Phosphatidylinositol diacylglycerol-lyase result in non-linear system responses. Secondly, in LSA implementations only a single parameter is perturbed at a time, while the rest of parameters remain fixed at their values identified from the best fitting. In cancer cells the network parameters may be subjected to significant biological variation. These limitations, along with the poor identifiability of the parameters in the large-scale network models, raise questions about the possibility of extending LSA-derived conclusions to more general cases of highly variable networks and large parametric perturbations. In this context, GSA approach has important advantages.