, 2005) For adults, direct exposure to PFOS and PFOA was estimat

, 2005). For adults, direct exposure to PFOS and PFOA was estimated by Vestergren et al. (2008) to contribute > 92% to the total intake of these two chemicals in a low- and intermediate-exposure scenario, whereas in a high-exposure scenario precursors contributed 50–60% to the total PFOS and PFOA exposure. Direct RG7204 order exposure via diet was estimated to be a major exposure pathway; however, the dietary contribution to the estimated intakes was likely overestimated. Using an improved analytical method, Vestergren et al. (2012) later showed that PFOS and PFOA concentrations in food samples had previously been overestimated by an order of magnitude. Since 2008 more

literature data have become available on PFAAs and precursors in exposure media. Precursors to C4, 6, 8, 10, 12 PFCAs, such as 4:2–12:2 FTOHs and PAPs have been reported in exposure media (De Silva et al., 2012, Gebbink et al., submitted for publication and Langer et al., 2010), however, how much these precursors contribute to human PFCA exposure as an indirect exposure pathway has so far not been investigated. Also, temporal trend studies have reported on declining PFAA and precursor concentrations in food (Gebbink et al., submitted for publication and Ullah et al., 2014). Based on

mammal studies, exposure to PFAAs could result in hepatotoxic, Crizotinib ic50 developmental, immunotoxic, and hormonal effects (Lau et al., 2007). In human serum samples, the PFOS isomer pattern has been reported to vary widely, containing between 17% and 52% branched isomers of total PFOS. However, serum samples generally contain a higher percentage of branched isomers relative to linear PFOS compared to ECF isomer pattern (30% sum branched isomers of total Cediranib (AZD2171) PFOS) (Beesoon et al., 2011, Glynn et al., 2012, Gützkow

et al., 2012, Karrman et al., 2007, Rylander et al., 2009 and Zhang et al., 2013b). The mechanisms or processes causing this enrichment of branched isomers in blood are not fully understood. In rats and humans, isomer-specific differences in uptake and elimination rates for linear and branched PFOS isomers have been observed (Benskin et al., 2009a, De Silva et al., 2009 and Zhang et al., 2013a). Also, reported differences in biotransformation rates of branched and linear precursor isomers could influence the PFOS isomer pattern (Benskin et al., 2009b and Peng et al., 2014). PFOS and/or precursor isomers have been identified and quantified in several human exposure media; however, the data are still limited. PFOS isomer patterns have been reported in dust, food, and drinking water, while for PFOS precursors only the FOSA isomer pattern was reported in drinking water (Beesoon et al., 2011, Filipovic and Berger, in press and Gebbink et al., submitted for publication). To date, there is no information available regarding the overall PFOS isomer pattern humans are exposed to via multiple direct and indirect exposure pathways.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>