The effect of

caspase-11-mediated lethality was similarly evident in Selleck BGB324 vivo [3, 8]. Both Casp11−/− and double Casp1−/− Casp11−/− mice were resistant to lethal septic shock, whereas Casp1−/− Casp11Tg animals all succumbed [3]. Similarly, Casp11−/− macrophages were more resistant to death compared with wild-type cells during infections with ΔFlag Salmonella or Legionella [3, 10]. However, pyroptosis induced by canonical stimuli (LPS/ATP, LPS/C. difficile toxin B or wild-type Legionella) required caspase-1, but not caspase-11, since these stimuli activate NLRP3 or NAIP/NLRC4 directly [3, 10]. The fact that Gram-negative bacteria activate the noncanonical inflammasome pathway and induce pyroptosis raised the question of whether caspase-11 might directly contribute to clearing bacterial infections. The ability of caspase-11 to restrict bacterial replication was evaluated in macrophages infected with L. pneumophila this website [4]. Casp11−/− macrophages were significantly more permissive for bacterial growth compared with wild-type macrophages. This enhanced permissiveness was related to impaired phagosome–lysosome fusion in Casp11−/− cells, which allowed bacteria to evade degradation [4]. This lack of phagosome–lysosome fusion required the catalytic activity of caspase-11 and was associated with impaired actin polymerization. Indeed, it had previously been shown that murine caspase-11 physically directs

actin-interacting protein 1 (Aip1), an activator of cofilin-mediated actin depolymerization [21]. Therefore, these results suggest that caspase-11 contributes to bacterial clearance by controlling the polymerization and depolymerization of actin, a crucial

step for phagosome–lysosome fusion. Interestingly, caspase-11-mediated phagosome–lysosome fusion proceeded only with pathogenic bacteria, but not with nonpathogenic bacteria, such as E. coli [4]. The protective role of caspase-11 during bacterial infection was also seen in vivo. A higher bacterial load was recovered from lungs of Casp11−/− mice infected with Legionella compared with that in wild-type mice [4]. Moreover, co-infection with equal numbers of Salmonella wild-type Dichloromethane dehalogenase and Salmonella ΔsilA, an attenuated mutant that is released into the cytosol, resulted in more efficient clearance of Salmonella ΔsilA in wild-type mice compared with Casp11−/− animals [20]. This suggests that caspase-11 is responsible for the clearance of Salmonella ΔsilA, whereas the wild-type Salmonella, by remaining inside the vacuoles, is not exposed to caspase-11 activity and hence cannot be eliminated by pyroptosis. In a different study using wild-type Salmonella, the number of bacteria recovered from Casp11−/− tissues was similar to that from wild-type mouse controls [8]. Interestingly, much higher bacterial loads were measured in double Casp1−/− Casp11−/− mice, which increased further in single Casp1−/− mice.