Near-band-edge emission and green emission are labeled. In order to investigate the influence of the ZnO NWs on light scattering, the spectral dependence of the total reflectance of nanowire

arrays was analyzed. Figure 4 displays the reflectance spectra of ZnO NWs with different growth times of 60, 90, and 120 min. We can observe that the silicon substrates covered by ZnO NWs have lower reflectance spectra in the range of 400 to 800 nm. This figure shows that the ZnO NWs with a growth time of 120 min have the lowest average reflectance of about 5.7% throughout the visible range (approximately 9.7% for 60 min and approximately 7.6% for 90 min). That is simply because it has been realized that PS-341 in vivo ZnO NWs with strong alignment, high aspect ratio, and uniform distribution can effectively enhance the antireflection coatings (ARCs) by trapping light and leading to a broadband suppression DNA Damage inhibitor in the reflection [17, 18] BAY 63-2521 clinical trial Accordingly, we expect that longer ZnO NWs have a much higher chance for the incident photons interacting with the NWs’ surfaces, and therefore, the absorption cross section would be considerably larger than the short ones as we increase the growth time. Figure 4 Reflectance spectra of ZnO nanowires grown for 60, 90, and 120 min, respectively. Figure 5 shows

the field emission I-V plots for the ZnO nanowire with different growth times. Note that all samples show similar emission current–voltage (I-V) characteristics despite the different growth times. Atorvastatin There are two different regions manifested in the I-V curve of all samples. In the low-voltage region, the emission current is low and seems to be independent of the applied voltage. Once the voltage is increased further, the emitted current increases dramatically and the turn-on voltages are 410, 440, and 550 V for growth times of 120, 90, and 60 min, respectively. Figure 5 Field emission characteristics of

ZnO NWs. They were grown for 60, 90, and 120 min, respectively. The inset shows Fowler-Nordheim plots of ln(I/V 2) versus (1/V). In order to analyze the emission behavior, the I-V characteristics of ZnO NWs are interpreted using the Fowler-Nordheim (FN) equation: (1) where J is the current density, V is the applied voltage, β is the work function, d is the emitting distance, β is the field enhancement factor, and a and b are the constants. As shown in the inset of Figure 5, factor β in the FN equation represents the degree of field emission enhancement. For a nanostructured emitter, the β value is related to its work function, morphology, crystallinity, conductivity, and density. By assuming 5.2 eV as the work function value for ZnO NWs, field enhancement factors were calculated to be 642, 492, 396 for growth times of 60, 90, and 120 min, respectively [19–21].