However, if the amount of rutile phase is too high in TiO2 nanofibers, such as 87.8% in cell III, the property of rutile phase

will play a leading role in the cell. A large transit time shows a slow electron transport in cell III, which leads to a decrease in electron diffusion length for cell III. From the above analysis, it is concluded that the superior J sc of cell II is a consequence of more efficient electron collection and light harvesting. As far as V oc is concerned, it is known that V oc corresponds to the energy difference between the quasi-Fermi Alvocidib supplier level of the electrons in the TiO2 under illumination and the redox potential. If the electron recombination is retarded, the electron density in the conduction band of TiO2 will be increased, which will result in a negative shift in quasi-Fermi level, thereby V oc will be increased [32]. Thus, the higher V oc of cell II is ascribed to the reduced electron recombination rate. For cell III, Idasanutlin cost in spite of the largest absorbance of visible light,

a relatively low J sc is produced because of an inefficient electron collection. The comparison of cells I to III highlights the existence of a synergistic effect between the anatase and rutile phases in TiO2 nanofiber DSSCs, as well as suggests a sintering temperature of approximately 550°C which is optimal for enhancing the performance of nanofiber DSSCs. Figure 6 IMPS (a) and IMVS (b) plots of cells I to III. Based on TiO2 nanofibers sintered at 500°C, 550°C, and 600°C. The AZD2014 influence of ZnO blocking layer on the performance of TiO2 nanofiber cells Based on the above results, cell II was chosen as the reference cell to study the influence of ZnO blocking layer on the performance of TiO2 nanofiber cells. ZnO fantofarone layers with thicknesses of 4, 10, 15, and 20 nm were deposited by ALD method on FTO substrates to fabricate cells IV, V, VI, and VII, respectively. J V curves of cells II and IV to VII are shown in Figure  7, and the photovoltaic characteristics of these cells are summarized in Table  2. Compared

with cell II, the performances of the cells with the ZnO layer are significantly improved. With the ZnO layer thickness increased from 0 to 15 nm, J sc of the cells is monotonously boosted, but when decreased obviously at 20 nm, it is still larger than that without the ZnO layer. It is noticed that enhancement in V oc and FF is very small. The largest J sc of 17.3 mA cm−2 is obtained from cell VI with 15-nm-thick ZnO layer, resulting in the highest PCE of 8.01%, in contrast with 16.3 mA cm−2 and 7.12% of reference cell II. This phenomenon indicates that the charge collection of the cells is improved by the blocking function of ZnO layer on interfacial recombination, which is very different from the reported decrease of J sc caused by thick ZnO blocking layers [30]. Figure 7 Photocurrent-voltage curves of TiO 2 nanofiber cells (sintered at 550°C and approximately 60-μm thick).