All rights reserved “
“P>The purpose of the present inves

All rights reserved.”
“P>The purpose of the present investigation was to characterize and compare traditional sleep architecture and non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep microstructure in a well-defined cohort of children with regressive and non-regressive autism, and in typically developing children

(TD). We hypothesized that children with regressive autism would demonstrate a greater degree of sleep disruption either at a macrostructural or microstructural level and a more problematic sleep as reported by parents. Twenty-two VX-770 Transmembrane Transporters inhibitor children with non-regressive autism, 18 with regressive autism without comorbid pathologies and 12 with TD, aged 5-10 years, underwent standard overnight multi-channel polysomnographic evaluation. Parents completed a structured questionnaire (Childrens’ Sleep Habits Questionnaire-CSHQ). The initial hypothesis, that regressed children have more disrupted sleep, was supported by our findings that they scored significantly higher on CSHQ, particularly on bedtime resistance, sleep onset delay, sleep duration and night wakings CSHQ subdomains than non-regressed peers, and both scored more than typically developing controls. Regressive subjects had significantly less efficient sleep, less total sleep time, prolonged sleep latency, prolonged REM latency and more time awake after sleep onset

than non-regressive selleck products children and the TD group. Regressive children showed lower cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) rates and A1 index in light sleep than non-regressive and TD children. Our findings suggest AZD7762 chemical structure that, even though no particular differences in sleep architecture were found between the two groups of children with autism, those who experienced regression showed more sleep disorders and a disruption of sleep either from a macro- or from a microstructural viewpoint.”
“Introduction. An endophthalmitis following penetrating keratoplasty by

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a devasting case with very poor visual outcomes.\n\nObjective. To determine the origin of an infection after a penetrating keratoplasty.\n\nMaterials and methods. After an endophthalmitis an epidemiological study was undertaken with the approval of the ethics committee and support of a medical team comprised of an epidemiologist, infectologist, bacteriologist and ophthalmologists specializing in cornea. Factors that may have contributed to the risk of infection were assessed, for example, the processing and preservation of the cornea in the moment of the extraction, the characteristics of the donor, recipient and infecting bacterium, as well as the details pertaining to the surgical operation.\n\nResults. No risks factors were found in the institution, in the eye bank facilities, in the donor or in the receptor.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>