Superoxide anion radical-scavenging activity was evaluated based on the method of Robak and Gryglewski (1988) with slight modifications. Reagents for the assay consisted of 150 μM nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT), 468 μM nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) and 60 M phenazine methosulphate (PMS) in phosphate buffered saline. An aliquot of 50 μl of extract, at different concentrations (0–1000 μg/ml),
was mixed with 50 μl of NBT, 50 μl of NADH and 50 μl of PMS. After incubation in the dark for 10 min at room temperature, the absorbance was read at 570 nm. Gallic acid, BHT, quercetin and rutin were used as positive GDC-0941 ic50 controls and analysed as above. Results were calculated as percentage inhibition of the O2- radicals, MEK inhibitor review using a similar formula as for the DPPH radical-scavenging activity. The EC50 was calculated and expressed as μg/ml. Nitric
oxide scavenging activity of the plant extracts was measured using a modification of the method described by Awah et al. (2010). Twenty-five microlitres of the extract, at different concentrations (0–1000 μg/ml), were mixed with a 25 μl freshly prepared 5 mM sodium nitroprusside solution in phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.3). The mixture was then incubated for 60 min under a visible polychromatic light (150 W). Griess reagent (50 μl), containing equal volumes of 1% sulfanilamide in 5% phosphoric acid (H3PO4) and 0.1% of naphthylethylenediamine dihydrochloride was added to the mixture and incubated for 5 min before absorbance was read at 550 nm. BHT, gallic acid, ascorbic acid and rutin were used as positive controls. Results were calculated, following the equation for DPPH-radical scavenging activity
and expressed as a percentage (%) of NO radical-scavenging activity. The EC50 was also calculated. The aqueous extract was prepared as described in Section 2.3 and lyophilised. The dried extract (5 mg) was mixed with 2 ml of 1.2 N HCl containing 20 mM sodium diethyl dithiocarbamate (DETC) in a glass vial before GPX6 being hydrolysed in a heating module with stirring capacity (Pierce Reacti-Therm Heating/Stirring Module No. 18971, Illinois, USA) at 90 °C for 2 h (Aziz, Edwards, Lean, & Crozier, 1998). The hydrolysate was then cooled and filtered through a 0.20 μm polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane filter prior to chromatographic analysis. Separation of polyphenols in the plant extract was achieved using an UHPLC method on an Agilent 1290 Infinity LC system (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) equipped with a binary pump, diode array detector and an autosampler. Separation of polyphenols was achieved on a C18 Zorbax Eclipse Plus column (50 × 2.1 mm i.d., 1.8 μm) (Agilent, Germany) at room temperature, using a modified method of Hung, Hatcher, and Barker (2011). Five microlitres of the sample were injected into the system. Mobile phase A consisted of 0.