Given that the rate of cases of intussusception following RRV-TV was estimated at 1 per 5000 doses of RRV-TV, studies of new rotavirus vaccines following RRV-TV needed to be sufficiently powered to detect and rule out a similar effect, if indeed it existed with previous
candidate vaccines. Two live oral rotavirus vaccines – RotaTeq™ (RV5) and Rotarix™ (RV1) – were tested in two large clinical trials ( Ruiz-Palacios et al., 2006 and Vesikari et al., 2006), each of which included over 60,000 infants. Neither vaccine was shown during clinical development to induce an increased rate of intussusception (ie the incidence of intussusception in those who received INCB024360 order the rotavirus vaccine and those who did not was comparable) or other SAEs. Since 2006, the two vaccines have been licensed for use in many countries. Selleckchem Cobimetinib Their licensure has been followed by rigorous post-licensure surveillance monitoring including an enhanced review of AEs reported
to VAERS. Intensive post-licensure surveillance is necessary to assess the safety of this vaccine with regard to intussusception, as occurrences of this rare event are expected to occur by chance following, but not caused by, vaccination – in the USA, the VSD is being used for this purpose and to evaluate any other possible associations. Reports of intussusception after vaccination have been received for both licensed vaccines. A clustering of 18 hospitalisations was identified following intussusception Cytidine deaminase (none of which were associated with fatality) in the period 1–7 days after the first dose in Mexico; no clustering was observed after the first dose in Brazil. This would translate to a risk of approximately 20–40 additional cases per year nationwide at current vaccination rates (approximately 2 million). Australian post-marketing surveillance studies found no increased risk of intussusception up to 9 months of age with either
Rotarix™ or RotaTeq™ vaccines. US data (from a smaller population compared with the Mexico data) do not show evidence of an increased risk of intussusception with RotaTeq™. If these data are confirmed, the level of risk with the two current vaccines is substantially lower than the risk of one case of intussusception in 5000–10,000 vaccinees seen with the withdrawn RRV-TV vaccine ( WHO, 2011). Occasionally, unexpected rare vaccine-related events, which were not detected during the pre-licensure clinical programme due to their low incidence rate, are detected once a vaccine is approved and administered to large numbers of individuals. Continuous and thorough collection and evaluation of safety data prior to and post-licensure is paramount to continuously assess and re-evaluate the benefit–risk profile of vaccines. Hurdles facing vaccine developers today can be practical, such as the search for immune correlates of protection, but also perceptual. Both issues are discussed below.