The corresponding commutation superoperators Hˆˆn(C) can be writt

The corresponding commutation superoperators Hˆˆn(C) can be written as differences between left-side and right-side product superoperators Hˆˆn(L) and Hˆˆn(R), defined by their action on a density operator ρˆ: equation(3) Hˆˆ(C)=∑nHˆˆn(C)=∑nHˆˆn(L)-Hˆˆn(R)Hˆˆn(C)ρˆ=[Hˆn,ρˆ]=Hˆnρˆ-ρˆHˆnHˆˆn(L)ρˆ=HˆnρˆHˆˆn(R)ρˆ=ρˆHˆn Their faithful

representations have exponential dimensions, but representations in low correlation order basis sets are cheap [13]. In a given operator basis Oˆk: equation(4) Hˆˆn(L)jk=OˆjHˆˆn(L)Oˆk=TrOˆj†HˆnOˆk=Tr⊗m=1Nσˆj,m†⊗m=1Nσˆn,m⊗m=1Nσˆk,m Because dot products commute with direct products and the trace of a direct product is a product of traces, we have: equation(5) Hˆˆn(L)jk=Tr⊗m=1Nσˆj,m†σˆn,mσˆk,m=∏m=1NTrσˆj,m†σˆn,mσˆk,min which the dimension Selumetinib research buy of individual matrices σˆn,k is tiny and does not depend on the Sunitinib clinical trial size of the spin system;

the computational complexity of computing Tr[σˆj,m†σˆn,mσˆk,m] is therefore O(1) and the complexity of computing one matrix element is O(N) multiplications, where N is the total number of spins in the system. With O(N2) interactions in the spin system, this puts the worst-case complexity of building the representation of the Hamiltonian in Eq. (3) to O(N3D2), where D is the dimension of the reduced basis set. The sparsity of spin Hamiltonians [19] and the fact that spin interaction networks in proteins are also sparse Selleckchem Fludarabine puts the practically observed scaling closer to O(N2D) – a significant improvement on the O(4N) best-case scaling of the adjoint direct product representation. This improvement is further amplified by the presence of unpopulated states even in the low correlation order subspace [8], by the existence of multiple independently evolving

subspaces [13], and by the fact that not all of the populated states belong to the propagator group orbit of the detection state [11]. Matrix dimension, storage and CPU time statistics for a 512 × 512 point 1H–1H NOESY simulation of ubiquitin (573 protons, ∼50,000 terms in the dipolar Hamiltonian) are given in Table 2. As demonstrated in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, the simulation is in good agreement with the experimental data. The state space restriction approximation reduces the Hamiltonian superoperator dimension from 4573 ≈ 10345 to 848,530. The reduced Hamiltonian is still sparse, and therefore within reach of modern matrix manipulation techniques – the simulation shown in Fig. 1 took less than 24 h on a large shared-memory computer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>