Original work published in Urology Practice includes primary clin

Original work published in Urology Practice includes primary clinical practice articles and addresses a wide array of topics categorized as follows: Business of Urology — articles address topics such as practice operations and opportunities, risk management, reimbursement (Medicare, Medicaid Torin 1 and private insurers), contracting, new technology and financial management. Health Policy — articles address topics such as organization,

financing and delivery of health care services from governmental and private payer policy perspectives, governmental and legislative activities influencing urology care, government affairs and policy analyses. the Specialty — articles address topics such as education and training, ABU certification, implementation of clinical guidelines and best practices across all subspecialty societies within urology and all specialty areas outside urology relative to contributions to the practice of urology. Patient Care — articles address topics such as treatment choices, best practices, reviews, detailed analysis of clinical guidelines, evidence-based quality of care, select clinical trials, clinical

implications of basic research, international health care and content for urology care team members. Authors must submit their manuscripts through the Web-based tracking system at https://www.editorialmanager.com/UP. The site contains instructions PARP inhibitor trial and advice on how to use the system, guidance on the creation/scanning and saving of electronic art, and supporting documentation. In addition to allowing authors to submit manuscripts on the Web, the site allows authors to follow the progression of their manuscript through the peer review process. All content is peer reviewed using the single-blind process in which the names of the reviewers are hidden from the author.

This is the traditional method of reviewing and is, Calpain by far, the most common type. Decisions to accept, reject or request revisions are based on peer review as well as review by the editors. The statements and opinions contained in the articles of Urology Practice are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. or Elsevier Inc. The appearance of the advertisements in Urology Practice is not a warranty, endorsement or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The content of this publication may contain discussion of off-label uses of some of the agents mentioned. Please consult the prescribing information for full disclosure of approved uses.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>